Coastal processing centres and Green cards

General and Other Policy
1

The President of El Salvador built a 40,000 place detention centre in seven months (I think) and filled it full of his countries gang members. He received criticism because many were shot during their arrest. His reply went somewhere along the lines of he did not care what others thought, he was concerned for the welfare of his people. El Salvador is now quite a safe place with women walking around safely and shopkeepers not having to pay tariffs to local yobs.

It is costing billions to have so-called asylum seekers in hotels and wandering in and out of our communities. We should have our asylum assessment centres on coastal islands, probably Scottish (sorry Scots), even if it cost several billion to make happen in the long term it would be efficacious monetarily and decelerate the ongoing erosion of our culture. All asylum seeking should be processed at this (or these eg. male or female/children) offshore centre(s) and therefore would necessitate even those in hotels to pass through them (ie it should be the only route to asylum). Asylum centres could be basic and run or overseen military style. And when this deters the dinghies and those in hotels were processed it could still function as an assessment centre for all the illegals that are here working and others we might wish to secure or deport. Any migrant lawyer communication should be through video calls from the mainland and could be monitored to avoid immigrants being schooled on how to game the system.

No asylum seeker should be granted British citizenship. We should offer those that qualify a conditional green card style system dependent on them having an established nationality elsewhere.

2

This is a good idea in principal however, if I am not mistaken the so called asylum seekers you reference I.e. the one’s in the hotels, have all entered the country illegally and I’d rather see a system that gathers them up and takes them home. I guess what I’m saying is that there is not much need to process their claim for asylum as, in my opinion, they have none. As for the so called asylum seekers that have entered legally the question is: Did they come from France? If the answer is “yes” I don’t see much of a claim for asylum either. I’m not entirely sure but I would suspect that the number of genuine asylum seekers that have not entered the country illegally is so low that they could easily be processed with our current facilities. I think the main thing to start with is gathering up the illegals, the criminals and the benefit free-loaders, and deport them which will take some pressure of our current systems enabling us to better deal with the situation. Just some thoughts, what do you think?

3

I was using the term asylum seekers as a catch all and whoever they are and wherever they are going we would do when to decant them all onto a centre on a coastal island and process them in whatever way from there.