I agree with Neil’s suggested amendments. Defining essential immigration would be an urgent first step for point 1.
In Iran under the Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi last Shah of Iran, the Islamists / Mullahs made common cause with the Socialists / Republicans to overthrow the Shah in 1979 to bring about the Iranian Revolution, which abolished the monarchy and established the Republic of Iran. The Mullahs then executed their co-revolutionaries and established an Islamic theocracy. Will this lesson be remembered / learned?
In common with many contributors here, the demographic threat posed by muslims is serious, especially in view of the fact that the vast majority are resistant to cultural integration and tendency to raise large families.
So any immigration policy will need to address this, despite the howls of ‘racist’ from all the usual suspects.
1 Like
Yeah it definitely needs to address this. I know there are REAL peaceful Muslims (some of which are also then known to convert to Christ instead, I heard they make real good Christians if they stick to it), and some have been voicing out against this because they wanted to flee the moderate-extremist versions (then they explain how they were trying to leave such people). We need something that is able to filter out the good from the “not helping”/bad.
Yes, “sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me”, we can’t be fearing being called names, yet I do see people cower from aggressive foreigners and even those or our own ethnic kind that has joined the narrative labour party spins, courtesy of the Fabian Society (connections to the socialist workers party like you see on the signs they wave whilst they call us all sorts at protests).
In my opinion, this moratorium simply has to be the iron hammer. Deport those unwilling to become integrated into our British society, focus on investigating problematic demographics, and perhaps make a system that uses us British to assist in such, so that it can go quicker. More men to help evict, then the swifter it shall be, and without a doubt a large chunk of muslims will have to go, I simply wouldn’t allow us Brits to pay for ticking time bombs (excuse the horrendous pun, but the meaning is there). I believe the UK needs to heal and reinvigorate our people with a love for our country, to those that have forgotten it of course.
1 Like
We’ve been hoodwinked by being told exclusively that Islam is peaceful and indeed the vast majority of people ascribed to this faith in this country are. However one only has to read the Quran to note that it advocates other ideas. We have been gaslit for decades, we have not understood the nature of this faith, especially in its fundamental beliefs about other faiths. We have not questioned and allowed ourselves to sleepwalk into disaster. We have fallen into the trap of thinking our governments have our interests at heart, which is patently obvious they DO NOT.
2 Likes
This one won’t work because it can lead to sinking of boats at sea, massive loss of life etc, it’s a publicity own goal if lots of people drown. Much better is to pick up people from boats… then sail to France or other point of origin and offload them. Achieves the exact same objective without the safety risks.
1 Like
Excellent. Those of lesser earning capacity, eg for NHS, care workers, under a certain minimum salary, eg a doctor’s salary, they should not have the right to remain beyond the end of their contract, unless it is renewed, nor should they be able to bring family members in a way that establishes a right to remain. the objective should remain to train these professions domestically, so that the need for these skills remains temporary.
1 Like
Agreed except;
Point 2. As Neil Barnes said, “For 10 years the number of people allowed into the country should be matched against the number of foreign nationals that leave, not British citizens.”
Point 8. Remove all the benefits of coming here and they will not come. Turning the boats in the Chanel will always be a poison chalice, the trick is to stop them leaving France.
1 Like
Point 8 is interesting. France does not want to keep them, for obvious reasons,and are quite happy for them to leave, and even more happy to receive £500 million from us to show willing of stopping them getting into boats! How do you make it a real obligation on france to stop them?
How very sensible. thank you
That’s simple. Let them know that, while we will respect them as humans, and give them a tent on a secured site until they are deported, they won’t want to come. We are the cause of this problem, not the French.
