Enhanced Criminal Fines Initiative (ECFI)

Policing & Security
1

Reduce property-related crime—specifically theft, burglary, criminal damage, and fraud—in the UK by implementing a robust financial penalty system that discourages offending, reduces reliance on overcrowded prisons, and addresses offences that significantly affect taxpayers.

This Policy Proposal is part of a collection of 3 interconnected but distinct policies with some dependancies between them. They are:

The Enhanced Criminal Fines Initiative (ECFI), Secure Borders and Immigration Control Initiative (SBICI), and Benefits System Reform and Integrity Initiative (BSRII). Together they form a cohesive framework aimed at protecting public resources, enhancing law enforcement, and promoting lawful behaviour in the UK. Their interlinkages strengthen their collective impact through shared principles and mechanisms.

Policy Overview:

  • Increase fines for theft, burglary, criminal damage, and fraud tenfold (e.g., a current £500 fine becomes a minimum £5,000) to enhance deterrence for these property-related offences.
  • Implement a tiered penalty structure:
    • First offence: Standard fine (e.g., £5,000).
    • Second offence: Doubled fine (e.g., £10,000).
    • Third offence: Custodial sentence (e.g., 6 months to 2 years) plus the doubled fine, which remains enforceable after release.
  • Fines are adjusted based on an offender’s net worth, calculated by the Criminal Fines Recovery Agency (CFRA) using a sliding scale to ensure equitable deterrence across income levels for these crimes. Net worth (assets minus liabilities) is assessed via bank accounts, property, and other holdings, with fines scaled as follows:
    • Net worth below £10,000: Base fine only (e.g., £5,000).
    • £10,000-£50,000: Base fine + 5% of net worth (e.g., £6,500 for £30,000 net worth).
    • £50,001-£200,000: Base fine + 10% of net worth (e.g., £17,000 for £120,000 net worth).
    • Over £200,000: Base fine + 15% of net worth (e.g., £50,000 for £300,000 net worth), capped at £500,000 per offence.
  • Establish the CFRA, modelled on the Child Maintenance Service (CMS), to collect fines efficiently for these offences through:
    • Direct Bank Account Deductions: CFRA withdraws funds from offenders’ accounts immediately upon fine issuance, ensuring rapid recovery of penalties tied to property crimes.
    • Asset Forfeiture: Expand the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 to allow seizure and sale of assets (e.g., homes, vehicles, personal property) for theft, burglary, criminal damage, and fraud, with proceeds offsetting fines.
    • Benefit Deductions: Deduct 50% from individual-specific benefits, such as Universal Credit (including housing elements), Personal Independence Payment, and Jobseeker’s Allowance, while exempting Child Benefit to protect dependants.
    • Police Seizure Powers: Introduce a Standing Warrant for Property Seizure (SWPS), enabling police to confiscate high-value items (e.g., luxury watches, cars) from convicted offenders of these crimes during lawful public encounters, with items sold to offset fines.
  • Ensure repayment continues until the fine is fully recovered, including after custodial sentences, providing a sustained financial consequence. The framework allows potential future expansion to other offence types.

Implementation Requirements:

  • Legislate the “Criminal Fines Enhancement Act” to define fine increases, penalty tiers, net worth adjustments, and CFRA powers specific to theft, burglary, criminal damage, and fraud.
  • Equip CFRA with automated systems, integrating real-time data from banks, the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC), and the Land Registry to assess net worth and recover funds/assets for these offences.
  • Train police to implement SWPS during routine operations targeting property crime offenders, supported by mobile technology linked to CFRA databases.
  • Update judicial guidelines to reflect the new fine scale, tiered sentencing, and net worth-based adjustments for these specific crimes, with CFRA providing financial reports at sentencing.

Legal Adjustments:

  • Assumes prior withdrawal from the European Court of Human Rights and repeal of the Human Rights Act 1998.
  • Amend key laws:
    • Proceeds of Crime Act 2002: Broaden asset forfeiture to all ECFI fines for theft, burglary, criminal damage, and fraud.
    • Banking Act 1987: Mandate bank cooperation for direct deductions and net worth assessments related to these offences.
    • Social Security Administration Act 1992: Permit 50% benefit deductions (excluding Child Benefit) for property crime fines.
    • Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984: Authorise SWPS seizures for these offences.
    • Sentencing Act 2020: Incorporate tiered penalties and net worth scaling for theft, burglary, criminal damage, and fraud.

Projected Impact:

  • Year 1 (Initial Phase): Significant financial consequences begin, with fines adjusted to net worth, bank deductions, and asset seizures applied to property crimes. For example, a £5,000 base fine for theft might rise to £17,000 for a £120,000 net worth offender, leading to a £15,000 car sale. Property crime rates decline by 15-20%, reflecting immediate deterrence.
  • Years 2-3 (Adjustment Period): Awareness of doubled, net worth-adjusted fines (e.g., £34,000 for a second burglary at £120,000 net worth) and asset losses grows, reducing reoffending by approximately 50%. Property crime falls by 30-40%, with theft and burglary showing the strongest declines.
  • Years 4-10 (Long-Term Outcome): The sustained financial burden—e.g., a £50,000 fine for a wealthy fraudster triggering home forfeiture—makes property crime highly unattractive. Property crime drops by 75-90%, with specific reductions estimated at 95% for theft, 85% for burglary, 80% for fraud, and 70% for criminal damage, addressing taxpayer concerns effectively.

Benefits:

  • Reduces prison reliance by prioritising financial penalties for property-related offences.
  • Generates revenue from fines and asset sales, particularly from high-net-worth offenders, to support public services and taxpayer interests.
  • Provides equitable deterrence by scaling penalties to financial capacity, targeting crimes that impact communities most directly.
  • Police seizing high-value items from offenders in public could lead to media attention that will reassure victims and the public and deter future offending.

Challenges:

  • Potential short-term increases in minor property offences due to financial strain, addressed by swift third-offence custody.
  • Risk of housing instability from benefit cuts and home seizures, requiring monitoring of social impacts.
  • Possible asset concealment by offenders, countered by CFRA’s enhanced investigative powers and “tainted gift” rules.

Rationale: By imposing substantial, net worth-adjusted financial penalties for theft, burglary, criminal damage, and fraud—such as a £5,000 fine for a low-income offender or a £50,000 fine for a wealthy one, potentially costing savings, assets, or half their benefits—the ECFI ensures that property crime carries a significant and proportionate cost. This approach encourages law-abiding behaviour over time, significantly reducing offences that affect taxpayers most, with flexibility to expand to other crime types in the future.

1 Like