Government-Funded Public Engagement App Policy

Freedoms
1

Purpose:
To enhance democratic participation by enabling citizens to access, review, and vote on proposed legislation, ensuring their voices inform parliamentary decision-making.

                            Core Principles

  1. Transparency:

    • All bills progressing through Parliament will be published on the app in plain language, alongside expert summaries and the full legal text.
    • Real-time updates on bill status (e.g., committee stage, amendments) will be provided.

  2. Civic Empowerment:

    • Registered users may vote “Support,” “Oppose,” or “Neutral” on bills during designated voting windows (aligned with parliamentary stages).
    • Votes are advisory, not binding, but Parliament must publicly debate results and incorporate them into official records.

  3. Accessibility & Inclusivity:

    • Free, multilingual, and compatible with assistive technologies (e.g., screen readers).
    • Offline access points (e.g., libraries, community centers) for digitally excluded groups.

  4. Security & Integrity:

    • Robust identity verification (e.g., government-ID linkage) to prevent fraud.

    • End-to-end encryption and independent audits to safeguard data and voting processes.

                         Key Features

  • Bill Tracking: Users receive notifications about bills tailored to their interests.

  • Educational Resources: Explanatory videos, FAQs, and neutral analyses to inform votes.

  • Feedback Channels: Surveys and forums for qualitative input on legislation.

  • Impact Dashboard: Publicly visible metrics showing how votes influenced debates/amendments.

                 Parliamentary Integration

  • Mandatory Reporting: MPs must reference app vote outcomes during debates.

  • Threshold Mechanism: Bills with >50% public opposition trigger an automatic parliamentary review.

  • Annual Review: Parliament publishes a report evaluating how public input shaped outcomes.

                            Governance

  • Independent Oversight: A cross-party committee monitors app functionality and fairness.

  • Anti-Manipulation Safeguards: Algorithms detect/disincentivize misinformation campaigns.

                   Implementation Timeline:

  1. Pilot Phase: Test app with select bills and regions; gather feedback.

  2. Full Rollout: Nationwide launch after addressing pilot insights.

  3. Ongoing Evaluation: Biannual reviews to improve accessibility and responsiveness.

                       Ethical Guardrails:
  • Public votes supplement—not replace—representative democracy.
  • Strict neutrality enforced: no political party branding or targeted messaging.

This policy seeks to bridge governance and civic participation while upholding parliamentary sovereignty and democratic integrity.

1 Like
2

I would say that we should be skeptical of “Experts” after what we see in some old legacy media sources. Its the old “Oh, Experts say milk is bad for you!” and you wonder which expert this is, and its one of the media staff members being gullible enough to someone elses lies, or just fibbing because it helps push a narrative.

I would almost want compulsory voting personally, because jeez we need it right now. I had a thought about this before though that we could have some voting centers scattered about, and perhaps a live parliament interactive voting for all viewers, but the software would have to be done in such a way that it can’t be tampered with.

I know you are being good of heart to have it be multilingual but being in Britain should mean know English, it would be part of the integration method, so if they don’t know or bother enough to learn English, then they’re not allowed to vote in my view, and likely many others.

We have to be careful of certain digital ID systems as that is where privacy liberties can be breached, so passport voting is perhaps an idea, but yeah, avoiding fraudulant votes is ideal, as I came by some rather worrying information about the amount of tampered postal votes happened last time…

One thing that comes to mind, is that in America, there was a bill that was almost passed through, but no-one was checking the further in pages, and so they ran it through Elon Musk’s AI service, Grok, and found that they snuck in secret funding for departments they didn’t want funded for 10 years without their permission. His AI can be used to filter out things and simply them into layman terms which is neat. Just came to mind to mention.

Transparency is key, and availability of bills should be made live and downloadable even before passing, so then there is no dirty business.

This seems fine to me, but real implementation needs some good scrutiny and testing.

1 Like