Proposal for Time-Based Social Media Restrictions & Mental Health Funding Initiative

Social media has transformed digital interaction, but its effects on child mental health and well-being are an increasing concern. Studies highlight links between excessive screen time, anxiety, reduced attention spans, and social isolation in young users. While parental controls exist, enforcement remains difficult. This proposal advocates for;

  1. Government-mandated time restrictions on major social media platforms to encourage responsible digital habits.
  2. An annual financial contribution from social media companies towards a Social Media Mental Health Fund, supporting initiatives aimed at protecting young users.**

Objective

To ensure that social media platforms actively contribute to child well-being through controlled access windows and dedicated funding for mental health programmes.

Component 1: Time-Based Access Restrictions

Social media platforms would implement scheduled access limits for children or indeed all access during key hours:

6:00 AM – 9:00 AM (pre-school preparation)
5:00 PM – 8:00 PM (family engagement)

This ensures children remain focused on school and personal development rather than being drawn into excessive social media use.

Why Scheduled Access Restrictions Make Sense

Society already recognises the importance of regulated hours for businesses. Shops, pubs, clubs, and bars operate under strict opening and closing times, ensuring structure in public life. These rules help maintain order and balance, preventing excessive or unhealthy behaviours. Applying similar principles to social media would reinforce responsible screen-time habits, reducing digital dependency among children.

Implementation Strategy

Cloud-Based Access Control: Platforms operating on cloud infrastructure (e.g., AWS, Azure) can enforce geo-targeted scheduled downtime, restricting service availability in the UK during specified hours. A term named “Elasticity”.

:pushpin: Understanding Cloud Elasticity
Cloud-based systems have a unique ability to scale up or down dynamically—a concept called elasticity. This means services can be switched on or off automatically, adjusting to usage needs without manual intervention. By leveraging this, social media providers could schedule automatic shutdowns at designated hours, ensuring platforms are inaccessible during restricted times while resuming operations seamlessly afterwards. This would be an efficient, cost-effective solution for implementing controlled access without disrupting overall functionality.

Legislative Adoption: Government-led enforcement through digital regulation ensures compliance, complementing the Online Safety Act.

Component 2: Social Media Mental Health Fund

Social media companies would be required to contribute annually to a government-managed Mental Health & Digital Well-being Fund, supporting initiatives that safeguard children’s emotional and psychological health.

Fund Allocation Areas

Early Intervention Programmes – Mental health education in schools, helping children develop healthy digital habits.

Counselling Services – Expanding free mental health support for children impacted by online toxicity or social media dependency.

Digital Wellness Research – Funding studies on the long-term impact of social media on child development.

AI-Governed Ethical Standards – Encouraging platforms to redesign algorithms that prioritise well-being over addictive engagement loops.

Public Awareness Campaigns – Educating parents, teachers, and children on balanced digital consumption.

Financial Model

Major platforms (e.g., Meta, TikTok, Snapchat) contribute a fixed percentage of UK-based ad revenue towards the fund.**

Funded programmes are managed through government oversight with periodic impact assessments.

Expected Outcomes

  • Healthier screen-time habits among children.
  • Reduced dependency on digital engagement during school and family hours.
  • Improved mental well-being, combating anxiety and overstimulation.**
  • A precedent for responsible AI governance, ensuring platforms contributepositively to child welfare.

I do beleive there are current discussions on a Health and Wellbeing fund, but no concrete proposals yet.

Conclusion

By combining scheduled social media access limits with mandatory financial contributions, this proposal strengthens the UK’s commitment to child welfare. Social media platforms must actively contribute to both digital well-being and mental health funding, ensuring ethical engagement practices that protect young users.

1 Like

Protecting children, what could possibly be wrong with that? Most social media platforms should be age restricted, just like bars, night clubs and movie theatres are. Social media platforms not designed for children should not be accessible to children. That said, this proposal does not sit well with me. It smacks of the nanny state. Inserting the government in a role reserved for parents. Parents need to be sovereign over their children’s online time. Adults should not be impaired in anyway. Perhaps give parents tools to enable to better manage children’s access, but leave them in charge? Top down nanny state knows best does not belong in the PAC.