Reform fall out?

I was politically homeless until I found GB-PAC, which, while not a political party, provides the sense of unity and purpose that Reform never did. Here, I feel as if I have a voice, but there was always the sneaking feeling in Reform that my purpose was to listen, obey and not argue.

Maybe GB-PAC might consider allowing us to open local branches (on a constituency basis, perhaps) where we can consider what is best for our areas and the country as a whole. Even as a non-party we might be able to swing local politics towards voting for the best person for the job, not just the party we favour most.

3 Likes

Hi Patrick,

The Great British PAC believes in empowering people and decentralisation. If you want to set up a local branch we welcome and encourage it.

We have some county and regional ‘directors’ in place. You can see the list here: Our People - Great British PAC

If you spot one covering your area (even if it’s county/regional level not quite local) then let me know and I’ll happily put you in touch. They will be delighted to support you in setting up a localised branch.

If you don’t see anyone covering your area, maybe you can be that person.

Just a technical note - they’re not quite ‘branches’ as such, just informal decentralised networks. You can call it a branch if you like, or just have it as an informal meeting group. One idea someone else had was to host monthly policy forums over wine and cheese. Whatever works best for you and your area is OK with us.

Thank you for getting involved!

Mike

1 Like

Hello there. It has been 27 days since that post and my eventual return to the platform after a busy moment, but to you I say good. Good, I can’t trust Reform now either, any trust has eroded itself to the wind, replaced with disgust and fury. There is no redemption for them in my eyes, they have muddied themselves in such a way that is beyond distasteful and it is an outright display of nonsensical stupidity of them to invite in the circus of people whom are very questionable by nature alone, let alone their future plans under Nigel’s influence. I will not support them.

1 Like

Thank you Mike,

I am still coming to grips with belonging to an organisation that believes in empowering people and decentralisation.

As I live in the West Sussex constituency of Bognor Regis and Littlehampton, my obvious contact point would be Anthony Mack, the South-East Regional Director.

1 Like

Sadly, the more I hear of Farage and Zia the more uncomfortable I get. I was recently removed from the Swindon branch of the Reform party whatsapp group as I was putting up links to Rupert’s and Ben’s various chats and YouTube appearances. The Uniparty will only ever continue the present downward spiral in the affairs of our great country and I saw Reform as it’s last hope. Where do we go from here? I was so glad to find the GBPAC. Can we look at a coalition of Reform (NF will insist on being PM!!) and the Tories as our salvation? I’m not sure at all but believe if Rupert and Ben headed an alternative party NOW I believe we could bleed away most of Reforms membership. So much common sense speaking from Ben and Rupert. What say you ???

5 Likes

I have also found out there are two more muslim donors to Reform UK. Do you think this will have an impact on the party?

Jeez, well that’s putting the last nails in the coffin.

Apart from the “It’s Reform all day long for me,” brigade who believe Nigel can walk on water.

1 Like

There is a deliberate attempt to destroy reform, and stop it from having a very real chance at forming a British government in 2029, its no coincidence that after several members of the party left they go straight to the media and tell tales out of class, Rupert Lowe is the latest, he is accused of bullying and with threats of violence, and is being investigated by the police, Ben Habib was the first one who didn’t get what he wanted and went straight to the media, you have to beg the question, do these people have no loyalty for the party, it doesn’t look like they have.

YouTube influencers are doing what they can to make sure that labor get another turn in office, people need to ask why?, what are they getting out of it, to call for the make up of a new party is just suicide at this stage in the game, to try and divide the public vote is going to give labor what they want, a second term in office.

Why do they want others to turn against a party so quickly and convince others to do the same does beg the question, the country i knew was Loyal, today people are only loyal to what others tell them to be.

Im sure that if the labor party were to see this group they would be over the moon, reform is the biggest threat to labor and with the local elections coming up they would want to hope that somehow the votes can be divided to break the hold reform has, a huge win for reform is going to rock the labor party to the core.

To support any other party this late in the game is a win for labor, you may as well vote for labor and watch the country being flushed down the toilet, knowing that you had a hand in it


Reform is not a company anymore, if you did your reasearch you would know that reform is now a proper political party and is not a LTD, farage doenst own a single share, the party now belongs to the people, stop believing what other people tell you and do some research


Your post sums it up for me.

Unite under one banner is a great suggestion. Would it need a set of core policies, not too wide, to facilitate coming together? If so, may be worth developing them. Suggestion of starting with the statement “I am not sure what we are doing here” and answering it will define boundaries of policy.
Another option is to foster further fragmentation of the centre right: Where will that lead!
Fly that banner!

1 Like

One of the many good things about GB-PAC is that provides a platform for debate rather than the frenetic rhetoric of Facebook and other social media. Therefore, I would like to respond to your post point-by-point.

“There is a deliberate attempt to destroy reform, and stop it from having a very real chance at forming a British government in 2029
”

You are so right, although it would seem that we might differ as to who is responsible for this attempted destruction.

“
, its no coincidence that after several members of the party left they go straight to the media and tell tales out of class
”

Neither Rupert Lowe or Ben Habib ‘left’ Reform they were kicked out. Rupert Lowe wrote the article that caused him to be removed prior to his removal. Ben Habib and Rupert Lowe have since written articles and been interviewed on the subject of Reform. What were they supposed to do? Sit quietly and let Reform have all the say?

“
Rupert Lowe is the latest, he is accused of bullying and with threats of violence, and is being investigated by the police
,”

‘Accused of
’ by members of Reform. The police have dropped their investigation. The KC hired by Reform to carry out an investigation has said that Reform did not allow her to carry out a full investigation.

“Ben Habib was the first one who didn’t get what he wanted and went straight to the media, you have to beg the question, do these people have no loyalty for the party, it doesn’t look like they have.”

This is an odd one. Loyalty is a two-way street. Why would Rupert Lowe or Ben Habib have any loyalty for a party that kicked them out and then attempted to defame them in all possible ways? That takes the notion of blind loyalty to a whole new level.

“YouTube influencers are doing what they can to make sure that labor get another turn in office, people need to ask why?, what are they getting out of it, to call for the make up of a new party is just suicide at this stage in the game, to try and divide the public vote is going to give labor what they want, a second term in office.”

With all due respect, that is abject nonsense. Pointing out that Reform has changed tack and is now trying to become another part of the Lab-Con Uniparty is just honest journalism. A rare commodity these days.

Let us look at a few facts.

The total Labour vote in 2024 was 9,708,716 as against 10,269,051 in 2019 when Corbyn was trounced by Johnson. The reason that Labour are in government is because the centre right did not vote and the only reason that they will get into power in 2029 is if the centre-right do not vote. They did not vote because they could not trust the Conservative government to be what they said they were.

After the last GE, with Reform getting five seats the attitude to Reform changed and they became the party that many of the centre-right saw as the only party that could lead them out of the current situation and away from the Islamaphoria that is dragging this country down.

Nigel Farage’s change of tack on the deportation of illegal immigrants, the removal of Ben Habib for the sin of disagreeing with Nigel and the withdrawal of the whip and the following slander and libel against Rupert Lowe brought home the indication that Reform was perhaps not the great right hope it pretended to be. Not just to the public but to the journalists who had until, then supported Reform.
This does not mean we will get a Labour government next time but may well get us a Conservative government.

“Why do they want others to turn against a party so quickly and convince others to do the same does beg the question, the country i knew was Loyal, today people are only loyal to what others tell them to be.”

It is not that they turned against the party, it is that the party turned against us with Nigel’s decision to become part of the Uniparty.

The thing is that there is loyalty and there is blind loyalty.

And by your own statement, you are only loyal to Reform because that is what others told you to be.

“Im sure that if the labor party were to see this group they would be over the moon, reform is the biggest threat to labor and with the local elections coming up they would want to hope that somehow the votes can be divided to break the hold reform has, a huge win for reform is going to rock the labor party to the core.”

Whether Reform does well in the local elections or not doesn’t really matter. The turn out for these is always abysmally low and has never proven to be an indicator for how a party will do in the general election.

“To support any other party this late in the game is a win for labor, you may as well vote for labor and watch the country being flushed down the toilet, knowing that you had a hand in it
”

We have three or four years before the next general election. An election Labour will not win, if they continue as they are, because they have upset as many of their own followers as they have non-socialists.
A week is a long time in politics. Three years is like the gap between the dinosaur extinction and now, in comparison.

A year ago, as a member of Reform – I joined in 2022, by the way – we were discussing the will they/won’t they of the 2024 general election. Out on the streets, campaigning anyway, the most asked question about Reform was ‘Who are they?’

After the general election there was a short honeymoon period but in September 2024 I was at a Reform meeting in London where we were introduced to the new Branch initiative and what that would entail.

It all looked very interesting and exactly what we needed in a ‘people’s party.’

Largely by omission, what we were told was untrue.

Later that month I was elected Deputy Chair of our local Branch.

Over the next six months, we were vetted and although much is made of this vetting, it is corrupt. There are a surprisingly large number of parliamentary candidates from the 2024 election who failed vetting. We were never told exactly why, but many were in prime locations where a ‘suitable’ candidate could be parachuted in, rather than have some local nobody get voted in.

Our attempts to make the branch work were thwarted by head office, while they were telling the membership at large how well it was all going. We had to sign NDAs that no other party demands. We were forbidden to talk to or discuss Ben Habib. Short of singing ‘The Red Flag’ we might have been in the Politburo.

And yet we kept going. Because we were loyal to an idea. To the notion that Reform would deal with what is perhaps the greatest existential threat to this country since WW2, mass illegal immigration. Right up until Nigel Farage said that, no, we wouldn’t be dealing with that threat.

“Reform is not a company anymore, if you did your reasearch you would know that reform is now a proper political party and is not a LTD, farage doenst own a single share, the party now belongs to the people, stop believing what other people tell you and do some research
”

Again, with all due respect, may I suggest that you follow your own advice and do some research. I would also suggest that this does not mean finding somebody who agrees with you and stopping there.

The reality is that while Reform UK Party Ltd does not belong to Nigel Farage, it does not belong to the people either. It was restructured on February 20th, 2025, as Reform 2025 Limited. This is listed as a nonprofit organisation with no shareholders, but with just two directors, Nigel Farage and Zia Yusuf.

This means that although Farage and Yusuf do not own Reform, they control it. So, the party does NOT belong to the people.

1 Like

I am sorry but Farage has ended more populist right and dissident right careers than the labour party, the guardian the BBC and the independent combined.

The thing with the Lowe Farage bust up is that there is a long list of people that say the same thing as Lowe going back to the 90’s, that Farage’s character flaws are large and stimy the partys he is in. Whereas people who had worked with Lowe, including the two people who were “bullied” have come to his defense with a defense of his character.

Finally Reform democratised by having 2 owners not 1. Not exactly what people were asking for.

2 Likes

I dont think you understood that reform is not a LTD, they are now a proper politicial party, which means if someone better comes along they can vote out farage, also, any vote not reform will give the country another labor government, you may as well vote for labor.

Yes I do understand and as I pointed out it is nonprofit organisation with no shareholders, but with just two directors, Nigel Farage and Zia Yusuf. And that company owns the Reform Party. There is no mechanism in place for anyone to vote out either Farage or Yusuf.

Your assertion that “any vote not reform will give the country another labor government” has no substance. At worst we will get a Conservative government, which with Farage and Yusuf controlling Reform might be more right-wing than Reform.

2 Likes

Farage, over the years, has done what he did to Rupert well over thirty times. It started with Kilroy-Silk, then Godfrey Bloom, Douglas Carswell, Susan Evans, Mark Reckless, Rupert Lowe, Howard Cox, Ben Habib, Alan Sked, Patrick O’Flynn, the list goes on
.

2 Likes

Indeed he has, and I have been late to the information, but I was made aware of it some days before my previous post, but yeah, all these names aren’t just numbers, they’re real people that you can interact with in life and politicians must maintain a respectable reputation, not alienate/attack people like Nigel has.

Integrity Party anyone? I did at 8pm this evening!

https://www.youtube.com/live/KwaQK2ky8j0?si=H5mzdnBCpBw6tEsk

2 Likes

Yes, about a week ago and in two weeks I am off to Bournemouth to hear Ben Habib and Peter Whittle talk about GB-PAC. I imagine Integrity will be in there too, somehow. Well, we aren’t all working on these policies for nothing you know.

1 Like