Remove subscription fees for Trade Union membership

1. Purpose

This policy is designed to fundamentally disrupt the financial mechanisms that support left-wing political movements in the UK, particularly the Labour Party, by prohibiting trade unions from charging subscription fees. It targets the flow of funds derived from union memberships that bolster partisan political activities, ensuring that unions cannot serve as financial conduits for the Labour Party or associated left-wing causes. By mandating free membership for all eligible workers, the policy promotes accessibility while strategically undermining the economic foundations of political left advocacy.

2. Background

Trade unions in the UK, governed primarily by the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, rely on subscription fees to fund operations, including collective bargaining, member support, and advocacy. However, these fees can deter low-income workers from joining, limiting their access to representation. This proposal seeks to eliminate subscription fees, making membership free for all eligible workers in a union’s designated work area.

3. Policy Objectives

  • Remove financial barriers to trade union membership by prohibiting subscription fees.
  • Ensure all workers in a union’s work area are eligible for free membership.
  • Maintain trade union functions through alternative funding mechanisms while enhancing accessibility.

4. Proposed Measures

a. Definition of Free Membership

  • Free membership means no subscription fees or other charges can be imposed for joining or remaining a member of a trade union.
  • Eligible members include any individual employed or engaged (including self-employed workers) in the work area or industry the trade union represents, as defined by the union’s rules or certification.

b. Prohibition of Subscription Fees

  • Trade unions will be prohibited from charging any fees for membership or related services.
  • All existing members will transition to free membership, and new members will join without cost.

c. Enforcement by Certification Officer

  • The Certification Officer, responsible for trade union oversight under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, will monitor compliance through annual audits of union finances and membership policies.
  • A public reporting mechanism will allow workers to report suspected breaches, such as indirect fees disguised as other charges.
  • Penalties for non-compliance include fines and, in severe cases, restrictions on union activities or deregistration.

5. Legislative Changes Required

To implement this policy, Parliament would need to:

  • Amend the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992: Introduce a new section prohibiting subscription fees and mandating free membership for all eligible workers in a union’s work area. Revise Section 1 to clarify unions’ obligations to offer free access without compromising their representative functions.
  • Create New Legislation: Enact a Trade Unions (Free Membership) Act to define eligibility criteria, outline enforcement powers for the Certification Officer, and establish penalties for non-compliance.
  • Amend the Trade Union Act 2016: Update provisions on union administration to align with free membership requirements, ensuring transparency in funding sources to replace subscription revenue.
  • Update Certification Officer Guidance: Revise existing guidance to reflect the prohibition on fees and the requirement for open, free membership, ensuring unions adapt their rules accordingly.

6. Expected Outcomes

  • Increased trade union membership, particularly among low-income and precarious workers.
  • Enhanced worker representation and collective bargaining power due to broader participation.
  • Greater public trust in unions as inclusive organisations focused on worker welfare.

7. Risks and Mitigation

  • Risk: Financial instability for trade unions due to loss of subscription revenue.
    • Mitigation: Explore alternative funding models, such as voluntary donations or workplace levies negotiated with employers, ensuring compliance with free membership rules.
  • Risk: Administrative challenges in verifying eligibility for free membership.
    • Mitigation: Develop clear eligibility criteria based on union rules and provide Certification Officer support for implementation.
  • Risk: Potential legal challenges from unions or employers.
    • Mitigation: Ensure legislation is precise, aligns with existing employment law, and includes consultation with unions during drafting.

8. Conclusion

This policy will democratise access to trade union membership by eliminating subscription fees and mandating free eligibility for all workers in a union’s work area. By amending existing legislation and empowering the Certification Officer, the proposal ensures unions remain viable while promoting inclusivity and fairness in worker representation.

3 Likes

I find this interesting, is there another country which has unions implemented more successfully that we could adopt from?
Or an example where they have done as you have said?

WRT funding, I think that if you were able to exchange HR with union that would be quite good even for a company, that would necessitate the removal of a bunch of legislation that requires a bunch of red tape that HR currently deals with.
I think that if say 0.1% of salary (plus any voluntary donations desired) went to union and you were automatically signed up to it that would be enough.

1 Like

Thanks for submitting this well thought out policy idea. I only found out recently that you can contact your union and advise them you want to opt out of political levies.

28 years I was a union member, inadvertently supporting the Labour Party.

If the law was changed to ensure people had to “opt in” I’m sure more people would be able to afford the fees. It would also put the Labour Party on a level playing field with all other parties.

I did a quick search and found this article:

https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201516/ldselect/ldtupf/106/10603.htm

1 Like

This is so relevant. I can’t see how any government can govern with integrity if they are reliant on funding from Trade Unions who fund for, it would seem, influence of policy and place government under the threat to comply, compromise to the demands or risk removal of labour and funding.

2 Likes